Обсуждение: RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...
*Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through >300 messages nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and 290 are trash ... What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned?
FEATURE(dnsbl,`korea.services.net',``Mail from $&{client_addr} rejected by
korea.services.net'')dnl
FEATURE(dnsbl,`brazil.blackholes.us',``Mail from $&{client_addr} rejected
by brazil.blackholes.us'')dnl
FEATURE(dnsbl,`opm.blitzed.org',``Mail from $&{client_addr} rejected by
opm.blitzed.org'')dnl
plus I have a contract for rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org
opm.blitzed.org is open proxies, and the others are obvious.
LER
--On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 17:41:37 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<scrappy@hub.org> wrote:
>
> *Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through >300 messages
> nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and
> 290 are trash ...
>
> What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned?
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > *Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through >300 messages > nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and > 290 are trash ... > > What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned? Avoid SPEWS. Vince. -- Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/ http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> FEATURE(dnsbl,`korea.services.net',``Mail from $&{client_addr}
> rejected by korea.services.net'')dnl
> FEATURE(dnsbl,`brazil.blackholes.us',``Mail from $&{client_addr}
> rejected by brazil.blackholes.us'')dnl
Yes, SPAM is really a problem here. Unfortunatelly, telco companies
won't do anything to keep spammers out of service. It's very radical to
simply drop all the brazilian IPs, and I just cannot do this otherwise
I'd be unable to talk to anyone. I've added about 20 B classes to the
mta's access list and 99% of the spam went away. This is because ALL the
spam that comes from Brazil are originated from ADSLs/Cablemodens. Yet, I used to receive many spams from US/China
untilI started
using spews.
I think that people with .org/.net/.com domains are really in a bad
situation. People say that when they receive 300 mails a day, 250 or so
are spam. This sounds really bad. In the worst times, I used to receive
at most 5-10 spams a day, from 400 other e-mails.
> FEATURE(dnsbl,`opm.blitzed.org',``Mail from $&{client_addr} rejected
> by opm.blitzed.org'')dnl
>
>
> plus I have a contract for rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org
> opm.blitzed.org is open proxies, and the others are obvious.
I found mail-abuse.org to be very burocratic to add a single IP to
it's database. I think this makes them much less effective.
[]s Ricardo.
Install SpamAssassin, and let it figure it out for you. It uses a whole list of RBLs and uses them to score a message as spam, instead of just blanket-denying messages from those SMTP servers. It works quite well. On Tuesday 27 May 2003 01:41 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > *Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through >300 messages > nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and > 290 are trash ... > > What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned? > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Michael A Nachbaur <mike@nachbaur.com>
Another vote for SpamAssassin. We use it at work here and it's quite nice. It puts all the "borderline" spam in a holding area and sends you a daily email with all the topics / names listed and you can request those out of the spam bucket. It's configurable to the extreme. On Tue, 27 May 2003, Michael A Nachbaur wrote: > Install SpamAssassin, and let it figure it out for you. It uses a whole list > of RBLs and uses them to score a message as spam, instead of just > blanket-denying messages from those SMTP servers. It works quite well. > > On Tuesday 27 May 2003 01:41 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > *Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through >300 messages > > nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and > > 290 are trash ... > > > > What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned? > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > >
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Tue, 27 May 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > > *Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through >300 messages > > nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and > > 290 are trash ... > > > > What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned? > > Avoid SPEWS. Ya, Spews is one of the 'evil ones' ... one of the blocks we were on in panama was in spews, and they don't seem to provide any way (that we could find) of removing the IPs when the offending server(s) were taken off the network ...
On Tue, 27 May 2003, scott.marlowe wrote: > Another vote for SpamAssassin. We use it at work here and it's quite > nice. It puts all the "borderline" spam in a holding area and sends you a > daily email with all the topics / names listed and you can request those > out of the spam bucket. It's configurable to the extreme. 'K, I haven't found *that* feature yet ... can you do this on a per-user basis as well, or is this a 'blanket, site wide' configuration ...
Per user or site.... I use Spamassassin AFTER the 4 RBL's and a personal fecal Roster. --On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 21:31:45 -0300 The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@postgresql.org> wrote: > On Tue, 27 May 2003, scott.marlowe wrote: > >> Another vote for SpamAssassin. We use it at work here and it's quite >> nice. It puts all the "borderline" spam in a holding area and sends you >> a daily email with all the topics / names listed and you can request >> those out of the spam bucket. It's configurable to the extreme. > > 'K, I haven't found *that* feature yet ... can you do this on a per-user > basis as well, or is this a 'blanket, site wide' configuration ... > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org > -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
On 2003-05-27 21:31:45, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > 'K, I haven't found *that* feature yet ... can you do this on a per-user > basis as well, or is this a 'blanket, site wide' configuration ... # When using the 'local:' quarantine method (default), the following # applies: # # A finer control of quarantining is available through variable # $virus_quarantine_to/$spam_quarantine_to. It may be a simple scalar # string, # or a ref to a hash lookup table, or a regexp lookup table object, # which makes possible to set up per-recipient quarantine addresses. I am very impressed with the amavisd-new, spamassassin, razor combination that I installed on my home machine a few days. Not had to manually process any spam since, and mailq provides a nice reference on what could be outright blocked. http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html is a well written guide to get started, although most of the details were taken care of by the debian package used. /Allan -- Allan Wind P.O. Box 2022 Woburn, MA 01888-0022 USA
I'm using bogofilter. It works well after learning what is spam/non spam. I save all spam into seprarate box and check it once a week. It takes mostly pressing "d" in pine and could be done very quickly. Oleg On Tue, 27 May 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > *Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through >300 messages > nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and > 290 are trash ... > > What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned? > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
Is it possible to get the transaction ID of the transaction a trigger fired on from plpgsql? I see in postgresql/contrib/dbmirror/pending.c a C based stored procedure that is accessing this information. I can't find anything in the online docs for accessing the xid from plpgsql. Brian Knox brian@mail.pantalaimon.net
I know there are alot of people that really appreciate PG and all the work that so many people have contributed. I am also sure that there are alot of people who would like to contribute to PG but don't feel they have any means except in the evangelism arena. This is something you could probably dish out to a few trusted individuals. Not to accept/post to the list but maybe to just check in and go through and delete all the spams. If that is possible to set up you can count me in as a volunteer to check in and do some spam clearing a couple times a day. Best Regards, Carl Garland _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail