Re: xlog patches reviewed
Re: xlog patches reviewed
От:
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Дата:
>> if this is the case, can we look at applying that patch >> tonight, give ppl till Friday to test and put out a RC1 >> depending on the results? Patch committed. There are still some loose ends to clean up: * I need to finish making an xlog-reset utility for contrib. * I stubbed out shmctl(IPC_STAT) in the BeOS and QNX4 emulations of SysV shared memory (src/backend/port/beos/shm.c, src/backend/port/qnx4/shm.c). This means that the new code to detect postmaster-dead-but-old-backends-still-running will never detect any problem on those platforms. Perhaps people who use those platforms can test and contribute real implementations? However, these shouldn't affect testing. regards, tom lane
Re: xlog patches reviewed
От:
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Дата:
"Mikheev, Vadim" writes: > but it's hard to notice eg misprints in 44K file -:) > I think we should apply patches and hard test > recovering for a few days (power off/pg_ctl -m i stop > with dozens update transactions). OK. I haven't finished putting together an xlog-reset utility quite yet, but I will go ahead and apply what I have. CAUTION TO ONLOOKERS: if you update from CVS after I make this patch, you will need to initdb!! Wait around for the log-reset utility if you are running a database you don't want to initdb. I should have that in another day or so. regards, tom lane
xlog patches reviewed
От:
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>
Дата:
but it's hard to notice eg misprints in 44K file -:) I think we should apply patches and hard test recovering for a few days (power off/pg_ctl -m i stop with dozens update transactions). Vadim
RE: xlog patches reviewed
От:
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>
Дата:
> > but it's hard to notice eg misprints in 44K file -:) > > I think we should apply patches and hard test > > recovering for a few days (power off/pg_ctl -m i stop > > with dozens update transactions). > > if this is the case, can we look at applying that patch > tonight, give ppl till Friday to test and put out a RC1 > depending on the results? I think so. Vadim
Re: xlog patches reviewed
От:
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Дата:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Mikheev, Vadim wrote: > but it's hard to notice eg misprints in 44K file -:) > I think we should apply patches and hard test > recovering for a few days (power off/pg_ctl -m i stop > with dozens update transactions). if this is the case, can we look at applying that patch tonight, give ppl till Friday to test and put out a RC1 depending on the results?
Re: xlog patches reviewed
От:
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Дата:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > >> if this is the case, can we look at applying that patch > >> tonight, give ppl till Friday to test and put out a RC1 > >> depending on the results? > > Patch committed. There are still some loose ends to clean up: > > * I need to finish making an xlog-reset utility for contrib. > > * I stubbed out shmctl(IPC_STAT) in the BeOS and QNX4 emulations of > SysV shared memory (src/backend/port/beos/shm.c, > src/backend/port/qnx4/shm.c). This means that the new code to detect > postmaster-dead-but-old-backends-still-running will never detect any > problem on those platforms. Perhaps people who use those platforms > can test and contribute real implementations? > > However, these shouldn't affect testing. Great, then let's go with a RC1 on Friday and see if we can get 7.1 out in '02 :)
Re: xlog patches reviewed
От:
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Дата:
The Hermit Hacker writes: > if this is the case, can we look at applying that patch tonight, give ppl > till Friday to test and put out a RC1 depending on the results? This should probably be called beta6, given that there is a lot of new code in it. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/