Would it be OK now to eliminate the separate xlog_bufmgr.c and
xlog_localbuf.c files, folding that code back into bufmgr.c and
localbuf.c? It's a real pain to have to make parallel updates
in two copies of that code...
regards, tom lane
> Would it be OK now to eliminate the separate xlog_bufmgr.c and > xlog_localbuf.c files, folding that code back into bufmgr.c and > localbuf.c? It's a real pain to have to make parallel updates > in two copies of that code... Yes, it's OK now. I'll remove #ifdef XLOG in other files soon. Vadim
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM> writes:
> Yes, it's OK now. I'll remove #ifdef XLOG in other files soon.
OK. Shall I do it, or do you want to?
regards, tom lane
> > Yes, it's OK now. I'll remove #ifdef XLOG in other files soon. > > OK. Shall I do it, or do you want to? If you have nothing to change in bufmgr now then I'll do it myself today/tomorrow. Vadim
>>>> Yes, it's OK now. I'll remove #ifdef XLOG in other files soon.
>>
>> OK. Shall I do it, or do you want to?
> If you have nothing to change in bufmgr now then I'll
> do it myself today/tomorrow.
OK, I didn't have any other reason to touch those files now.
regards, tom lane
Сайт использует файлы cookie для корректной работы и повышения удобства. Нажимая кнопку «Принять» или продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы соглашаетесь на их использование в соответствии с Политикой в отношении обработки cookie ООО «ППГ», в том числе на передачу данных из файлов cookie сторонним статистическим и рекламным службам. Вы можете управлять настройками cookie через параметры вашего браузера