Обсуждение: pg on NT

have people out there had equal success with both
workstation and server nt 4.0 ?

also what have success rates with 2000 been ?

jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff MacDonald [mailto:jeff@pgsql.com]
> Sent: 05 June 2000 05:35
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: [HACKERS] pg on NT
> 
> 
> have people out there had equal success with both
> workstation and server nt 4.0 ?
> 
> also what have success rates with 2000 been ?
> 
> jeff
> 

I'm running my own build of v7.0.0 on Windows 2000 Professional (Dell
Inspiron Laptop, PIII 500, 128Mb) with no problems at if I manually start
the Postmaster from a bash shell. All my attempts to autostart (via scripts
and tools like srvany) the postmaster have failed miserably to date. It's
not exactly quick though...

Regards,  
Dave.  
-- 
Disclaimer: the above is the author's personal opinion and is not the
opinion or policy of his employer or of the little green men that have been
following him all day.
http://www.vale-housing.co.uk/ - http://www.pgadmin.freeserve.co.uk/

Jeff MacDonald wrote:

> have people out there had equal success with both
> workstation and server nt 4.0 ?
>
> also what have success rates with 2000 been ?

Hi Jeff,

I run PostgreSQL 7.0 with Cygwin-b20.1 on Windows NT 4.0,
it works fine so far. I also built the binary, it's available at:

ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/binary/v7.0/NT/postgresql-7.0-nt-binaries.tar.gz

> jeff

- Kevin