Обсуждение: Re: ECPG documentation
(back on-list; hope that is OK...) > I just wanted to let you know that some time ago, after contacting > Michael Meskes I have started working on ECPG documentation. > ... you can see some text file sketches on my web at > http://www.ultra.hr/gpl/ecpg Looks great! Hope you find time to get back to it, and I'll be happy to help with sgml markup. btw, if you could finish a first draft (or have enough sections to be usable) within a month or so there is a good chance we can get it included in the v7.0 release. Much later than that and we'll probably miss the window... - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
This looks really good. Please, please, please keep working on this documentation. Wish I'd had your work several months ago!! Steve Thomas Lockhart wrote: > (back on-list; hope that is OK...) > > > I just wanted to let you know that some time ago, after contacting > > Michael Meskes I have started working on ECPG documentation. > > ... you can see some text file sketches on my web at > > http://www.ultra.hr/gpl/ecpg > > Looks great! Hope you find time to get back to it, and I'll be happy > to help with sgml markup. > > btw, if you could finish a first draft (or have enough sections to be > usable) within a month or so there is a good chance we can get it > included in the v7.0 release. Much later than that and we'll probably > miss the window... > > - Thomas > > -- > Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu > South Pasadena, California > > ************
> > > I just wanted to let you know that some time ago, after contacting > > > Michael Meskes I have started working on ECPG documentation. > > > ... you can see some text file sketches on my web at > > > http://www.ultra.hr/gpl/ecpg > > Looks great! Hope you find time to get back to it, and I'll be happy > > to help with sgml markup. > > btw, if you could finish a first draft (or have enough sections to be > > usable) within a month or so there is a good chance we can get it > > included in the v7.0 release. Much later than that and we'll probably > > miss the window... Hello Ivo. Have you had a chance to make progress on your docs? I'm sure people would be *very* interested in them for the upcoming release, and if you need some help on finishing the writing or editing I'm sure there will be some volunteers. Regards. - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 10:15:24PM +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > Hello Ivo. Have you had a chance to make progress on your docs? I'm > sure people would be *very* interested in them for the upcoming > release, and if you need some help on finishing the writing or editing > I'm sure there will be some volunteers. I'm willing to help with explanations. But I won't have the time to write docs in time for the release. In fact I even haven't found the time to tackle my one and only todo item for 7.0. BTW I have a problem with a user defined function. I posted a question about some time ago but got no answer. The source is part of our source tree (pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/test[test5.pgc|stp.pgc]). I can insert it but when I execute it I get a result of -220 which is not exactly the minimu of 14 and 7. Any ideas? Just hitting make in ecpg/test should build the binaries. YOu just have to adjust the path in test5.pgc. Michael -- Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers! Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire! Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux! Email: Michael@Fam-Meskes.De | Use PostgreSQL!