Обсуждение: Re: Getting FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command

--------Peter Hopfgartner <peter.hopfgartner@r3-gis.com> wrote--------
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Getting FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command
Date: 16.09.2010 16:56

>--------Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote--------
>
>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Getting FATAL: terminating connection due to
>administrator command 
>
>Date: 15.09.2010 17:40
>
>
>
>>Peter Hopfgartner <peter.hopfgartner@r3-gis.com> writes:
>
>>> --------Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote--------
>
>>>> This is a result of something sending SIGTERM to the backend process.
>
>>
>
>>> Can I trace where the SIGTERM comes from?
>
>>
>
>>If this is a recent Red-Hat-based release, I think that systemtap could
>
>>probably be used to determine that.  There's a script here that solves
>
>>a related problem:
>
>>http://sourceware.org/systemtap/examples/process/sigmon.stp
>


Now we had the error, but systemtap did not report any SIGTERM. Is it possible to have this error without a SIGTERM
beinginvolved? As mentioned in a previous mail, I've modified the script to report SIGTERM sent to any process.
 

Peter

Peter Hopfgartner <peter.hopfgartner@r3-gis.com> writes:
> Now we had the error, but systemtap did not report any SIGTERM. Is it
> possible to have this error without a SIGTERM being involved?

Hmph.  I would have said not, but ...

What PG version is this exactly?

            regards, tom lane

Peter Hopfgartner <peter.hopfgartner@r3-gis.com> writes:

> [...]
> > >http://sourceware.org/systemtap/examples/process/sigmon.stp

> Now we had the error, but systemtap did not report any SIGTERM. Is
> it possible to have this error without a SIGTERM being involved? As
> mentioned in a previous mail, I've modified the script to report
> SIGTERM sent to any process.

There are some other possibilities.  It's possible that the version of
stap you're using is not expanding signal.send to all possible paths
of the kernel dispatching signals to your process.

So one might try a few different things:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
# see what die() is getting to work with
probe process("/usr/bin/postgres").function("die") {
   printf("%s[%d] received %d\n", execname(), pid(), $postgres_signal_arg)
}

# check for another process sending SIGTERM
probe syscall.kill {
   if (sig == 15) {
        printf("%s[%d] sending %s\n", execname(), pid(), argstr)
        print_ubacktrace()
   }
}

# heck, trace the whole statement sequence during the signal handling
probe process("/usr/bin/postgres").statement("die@*:*"),
      process("/usr/bin/postgres").statement("ProcessInterrupts@*:*") {
   printf("%s %s\n", pp(), $$vars)
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can run that in the background.  The second probe will give
systemwide SIGTERM activity, so you may need to filter it a bit.
If you know the appropriate postmaster process-id, you could change
the syscall.kill probe:

< if (sig == 15) {
> if (sig == 15 && pid == target_pid()) {

and invoke the script with   stap ... -x PID_OF_YOUR_POSTGRES_SERVER
(In this case, "sig" and "pid" come from the syscall arguments, that
is represent the intended signal recepient, rather than the sender;
see also 'stap -L signal.send'.)

Note that postgres does sometimes send signals to itself, so don't be
surprised to see post* processes show up there.

(A more modern system compiler & systemtap would give you much better
variable-value dumping options.)


- FChE