Обсуждение: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487
PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487
От
"Abraham, Danny"
Дата:
The server intermittently fails on simple queries. Log full of the above error log. Does anyone know on which version this problem is fixed? Or a specific patch? Thanks Danny Abraham BMC Software CTM&D Business Unit 972-52-4286-513 danny_abraham@bmc.com
Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487
От
Scott Marlowe
Дата:
I don't believe it's been fixed. It seems like the folks who hack the windows port haven't got a reproduceable failure. On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Abraham, Danny<danny_abraham@bmc.com> wrote: > The server intermittently fails on simple queries. > Log full of the above error log. > > Does anyone know on which version this problem is fixed? > Or a specific patch? > > Thanks > > Danny Abraham > BMC Software > CTM&D Business Unit > 972-52-4286-513 > danny_abraham@bmc.com > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > -- When fascism comes to America, it will be intolerance sold as diversity.
Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487
От
Magnus Hagander
Дата:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:00, Abraham, Danny<danny_abraham@bmc.com> wrote: > The server intermittently fails on simple queries. > Log full of the above error log. > > Does anyone know on which version this problem is fixed? > Or a specific patch? Please see http://blog.hagander.net/archives/149-Help-us-test-a-patch-for-the-Win32-shared-memory-issue.html for binaries with an experimental patch. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487
От
"Abraham, Danny"
Дата:
Does anybody have a proven way to regenerate this problem? SO that I can tell that the patch really does fix it? Thanks Danny
Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487
От
"Abraham, Danny"
Дата:
Does anybody have a proven way to regenerate this problem? This way I can decide that the patch does fix it? Thanks Danny
Re: Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487
От
Magnus Hagander
Дата:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:22, Abraham, Danny<danny_abraham@bmc.com> wrote: > Does anybody have a proven way to regenerate this problem? > > SO that I can tell that the patch really does fix it? No. That's the reason it has taken so long to figure out how to fix it (which we hopefully have done now). -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Re: Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487
От
Magnus Hagander
Дата:
2010/2/4 Owen Hartnett <owen@clipboardinc.com>: > > On Aug 9, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:22, Abraham, Danny<danny_abraham@bmc.com> wrote: >>> Does anybody have a proven way to regenerate this problem? >>> >>> SO that I can tell that the patch really does fix it? >> >> No. That's the reason it has taken so long to figure out how to fix it >> (which we hopefully have done now). > > Has a consensus been arrived at? Is this patch rolled into the current system? The patch is included in the latest versions, yes. I don't recall seeing any reports of the problem remaining after the patch, but it's not 100% sure of course. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Re: Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487
От
Owen Hartnett
Дата:
On Aug 9, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:22, Abraham, Danny<danny_abraham@bmc.com> wrote: >> Does anybody have a proven way to regenerate this problem? >> >> SO that I can tell that the patch really does fix it? > > No. That's the reason it has taken so long to figure out how to fix it > (which we hopefully have done now). Has a consensus been arrived at? Is this patch rolled into the current system? I have a client wants to install W2K8 server release 2 and he's asking if there's any conflict. I can update him to thelatest when he does. Thanks, -Owen > > > -- > Magnus Hagander > Me: http://www.hagander.net/ > Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general >
Re: Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487
От
Owen Hartnett
Дата:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > 2010/2/4 Owen Hartnett <owen@clipboardinc.com>: >> >> On Aug 9, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:22, Abraham, Danny<danny_abraham@bmc.com> wrote: >>>> Does anybody have a proven way to regenerate this problem? >>>> >>>> SO that I can tell that the patch really does fix it? >>> >>> No. That's the reason it has taken so long to figure out how to fix it >>> (which we hopefully have done now). >> >> Has a consensus been arrived at? Is this patch rolled into the current system? > > The patch is included in the latest versions, yes. I don't recall > seeing any reports of the problem remaining after the patch, but it's > not 100% sure of course. Thanks, Magnus, I can see no reason why we shouldn't attempt to migrate to Server 2008 now. -Owen