Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
От:
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Дата:
Mario Splivalo wrote: > None of the array functions > (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) > are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? > I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. Agreed -- please submit a patch. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
От:
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Дата:
Mario Splivalo wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Mario Splivalo writes: > >> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation? > > > > I think you just did. Applied, thanks. > > I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4 > documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8.3). > > > PS: why'd you omit unnest()? > > I overlooked it, I guess. Sorry. Did unnest() get added properly too? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
От:
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Дата:
Mario Splivalo writes: > Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation? I think you just did. Applied, thanks. regards, tom lane PS: why'd you omit unnest()?
Array functions not mentioned in Index
От:
Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr>
Дата:
None of the array functions (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. Mike
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
От:
Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr>
Дата:
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Mario Splivalo wrote: >> None of the array functions >> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) >> are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? >> I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. > > Agreed -- please submit a patch. > Sure thing. It will take some time to get along with Docbook, indexing and everything. Mike
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
От:
Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr>
Дата:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Mario Splivalo wrote:
>> None of the array functions
>> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html)
>> are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional?
>> I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index.
>
> Agreed -- please submit a patch.
Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?
Mario
? func.sgml.patch
Index: doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.473
diff -c -r1.473 func.sgml
*** doc/src/sgml/func.sgml 23 Mar 2009 21:00:38 -0000 1.473
--- doc/src/sgml/func.sgml 1 Apr 2009 01:48:14 -0000
***************
*** 9338,9343 ****
--- 9338,9380 ----
for more discussion and examples of the use of these functions.
+
+ array_append
+
+
+ array_cat
+
+
+ array_ndims
+
+
+ array_dims
+
+
+ array_fill
+
+
+ array_length
+
+
+ array_lower
+
+
+ array_prepend
+
+
+ array_to_string
+
+
+ array_upper
+
+
+ string_to_array
+
+
+ cardinality
+
+
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
От:
Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr>
Дата:
Tom Lane wrote: > Mario Splivalo writes: >> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation? > > I think you just did. Applied, thanks. I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4 documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8.3). > PS: why'd you omit unnest()? I overlooked it, I guess. Sorry. Mike
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index
От:
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Дата:
Bruce Momjian writes: > Did unnest() get added properly too? Yes, I included it in the patch. regards, tom lane