Обсуждение: Docs build failure on plpgsql.sgml
I am seeing a docs build failure : openjade:plpgsql.sgml:1646:10:E: end tag for "SECT3" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified openjade:plpgsql.sgml:1640:5: start tag was here make: *** [html] Error 1 Adding an extra </sect3> tag after line 1645 will make it build ok on my system (not sure if that was the intent of the previous change tho) regards Mark
Mark Kirkwood <markir@coretech.co.nz> writes: > I am seeing a docs build failure : Fixed, thanks. (You must be running a pickier version of docbook than is installed at postgresql.org ...) regards, tom lane
Hmmm ... good point - configure thinks I am running 4.2, but the stylesheets etc might be more recent than postgresql.org's: $ rpm -qa|grep docbook docbook-dtds-1.0-25 docbook-style-dsssl-1.78-4 Tom Lane wrote: >Mark Kirkwood <markir@coretech.co.nz> writes: > > >>I am seeing a docs build failure : >> >> > >Fixed, thanks. (You must be running a pickier version of docbook >than is installed at postgresql.org ...) > > regards, tom lane > >
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:36:55PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Hmmm ... good point - configure thinks I am running 4.2, but the > stylesheets etc might be more recent than postgresql.org's: > > $ rpm -qa|grep docbook > docbook-dtds-1.0-25 > docbook-style-dsssl-1.78-4 Peter announced just the other day he wants the docs to be built with stylesheets 1.79 ... -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>) "Ciencias políticas es la ciencia de entender por qué los políticos actúan como lo hacen" (netfunny.com)
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> writes: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:36:55PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >> Hmmm ... good point - configure thinks I am running 4.2, but the >> stylesheets etc might be more recent than postgresql.org's: >> >> $ rpm -qa|grep docbook >> docbook-dtds-1.0-25 >> docbook-style-dsssl-1.78-4 > Peter announced just the other day he wants the docs to be built with > stylesheets 1.79 ... Mark's versions are the same as what I have on an up-to-date Fedora Core 3 box. (And I did duplicate his failure upon trying ... I'd not tried to build the docs on that box lately.) If 1.78 is pickier than 1.79, I think it's good to keep ourselves honest by making sure that the docs build against 1.78. We can say that 1.79 wins if differences of visual presentation come up, but as far as the markup correctness is concerned, better tighter than looser. regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Fixed, thanks. (You must be running a pickier version of docbook > than is installed at postgresql.org ...) I think the only thing that could affect this is the version of jade/openjade. Certainly not the stylesheet version. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/