Обсуждение: 6.5 and 7.0 docs
While we're at it, can we regen 6.5 and 7.0's docs for the user's lounge? I thought I checked them into cvs last week, apparantly I didn't. :( Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net128K ISDN from $22.00/mo - 56K Dialup from $16.00/moat Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ==========================================================================
> While we're at it, can we regen 6.5 and 7.0's docs for the user's lounge?
> I thought I checked them into cvs last week, apparantly I didn't. :(
That's OK. You may want to consider *not* checking them in at all,
since they are, in principle, recoverable from the distro tarballs.
I couldn't recall the exact layout, but have placed v6.5 and v7.0 docs
tarballs, ps, and html files in users-lounge/docs/{v6.5,v7.0},
respectively. Perhaps I could write a script which you could put into
cvs to help unpack the distro tarballs and extract the relevant docs
files.
Looks like a doxlist.html is missing from the lounge area? And as a
style point, could/should the directory be labeled "doc" rather than
"docs" to be consistant with the tarball labeling? I recall "docs"
being used before, so went with that for now.
I have not yet replaced the developer's stuff, and would propose doing
that with the autogenerated files sometime soon.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > While we're at it, can we regen 6.5 and 7.0's docs for the user's lounge?
> > I thought I checked them into cvs last week, apparantly I didn't. :(
>
> That's OK. You may want to consider *not* checking them in at all,
> since they are, in principle, recoverable from the distro tarballs.
>
> I couldn't recall the exact layout, but have placed v6.5 and v7.0 docs
> tarballs, ps, and html files in users-lounge/docs/{v6.5,v7.0},
> respectively. Perhaps I could write a script which you could put into
> cvs to help unpack the distro tarballs and extract the relevant docs
> files.
>
> Looks like a doxlist.html is missing from the lounge area? And as a
> style point, could/should the directory be labeled "doc" rather than
> "docs" to be consistant with the tarball labeling? I recall "docs"
> being used before, so went with that for now.
Directory names aren't set in stone yet. About the only objection I'd
have at this point is if someone chose a dir name that was a pain to
type!!
> I have not yet replaced the developer's stuff, and would propose doing
> that with the autogenerated files sometime soon.
For me, "soon" is nearing next week. Tomorrow AM I'm gone for the
week.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net128K ISDN from $22.00/mo - 56K Dialup from
$16.00/moat Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop
Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================