Обсуждение: pgsql: Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

pgsql: Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc

От
tgl@postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Дата:
Log Message:
-----------
Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc changes.

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/doc/src/sgml:
        btree-gist.sgml (r1.6 -> r1.7)
        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/btree-gist.sgml?r1=1.6&r2=1.7)

Re: pgsql: Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc

От
Robert Haas
Дата:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@postgresql.org> wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc changes.

Woops, sorry.  Didn't proofread that one as carefully as I should have.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

Re: pgsql: Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@postgresql.org> wrote:
>> Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc changes.

> Woops, sorry.  Didn't proofread that one as carefully as I should have.

It appears that it would've built anyway in some contexts (the build at
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/buildlog.html
wasn't complaining for instance).  I only noticed it because I saw a
failure while doing a VPATH build.  I'm still trying to figure out why
that matters ...

            regards, tom lane

Re: pgsql: Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc

От
Robert Haas
Дата:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@postgresql.org> wrote:
>>> Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc changes.
>
>> Woops, sorry.  Didn't proofread that one as carefully as I should have.
>
> It appears that it would've built anyway in some contexts (the build at
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/buildlog.html
> wasn't complaining for instance).  I only noticed it because I saw a
> failure while doing a VPATH build.  I'm still trying to figure out why
> that matters ...

It did work here for me (I just double checked, and it worked again),
but I still should have caught it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company