Обсуждение: 'Save Definition' - no opportunity to create new file

Hi<br /><br />I'm trying to save a definition of a function.  I highlight the function I'm interested in, click on
File->Savedefinition.  A a file dialog opens, but it won't let me create/choose a *new* file.  It's like someone set
aflag in the file dialog to require an existing file.  Same thing happens if I try to save the definition of a table or
asequence or a schema.  Those are the only ones I've tried. <br /><br />I'm runing version 1.4.3 that I just compiled
withthe standard options (./configure) on latest stable version of Ubuntu:  "Ubuntu 6.06 LTS  - the Dapper Drake"<br
/><br/>Can some one comment on this counter-intuitive behaviour? <br /><br />Thanks<br />Vic<br /><br />-- <br />"They
thatcan give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."<br />    Ben
Franklin 

<font face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:12.0px"><br /><br /><br /> On 10/8/06 22:47, "Vic Simkus"
<vic.simkus@gmail.com>wrote:<br /><br /></span></font><blockquote><font face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span
style="font-size:12.0px">Hi<br/><br /> I'm trying to save a definition of a function.  I highlight the function I'm
interestedin, click on File->Save definition.  A a file dialog opens, but it won't let me create/choose a *new*
file. It's like someone set a flag in the file dialog to require an existing file.  Same thing happens if I try to save
thedefinition of a table or a sequence or a schema.  Those are the only ones I've tried. <br /><br /> I'm runing
version1.4.3 that I just compiled with the standard options (./configure) on latest stable version of Ubuntu:  "Ubuntu
6.06LTS  - the Dapper Drake"<br /><br /> Can some one comment on this counter-intuitive behaviour? <br /><br
/></span></font></blockquote><fontface="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:12.0px">I only have a Mac
withme at the moment, but the code looks fine and it works as it should on this platform. Can anyone else confirm this
bug?<br/><br /> Regards, Dave.</span></font>