Обсуждение: Re: stack trace
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:jm.poure@freesurf.fr] > Sent: 25 June 2003 19:49 > To: Andreas Pflug; Reinhard Max > Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] stack trace > > > Andreas, I thought the latest recommanded version was > 2003-06-07. All RPMs are based on it. Shall I upgrade them > all? This can be done within > hours if you require it. I thought we had agreed to stick to 2003-06-07 unless a specific reason for upgrading cropped up? I don't want us to be chasing new wxWindows bugs this close to release unless there's a damn good reason. I'm nervous enough using CVS code... Regards, Dave.
Dave Page wrote: > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:jm.poure@freesurf.fr] >>Sent: 25 June 2003 19:49 >>To: Andreas Pflug; Reinhard Max >>Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org >>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] stack trace >> >> >>Andreas, I thought the latest recommanded version was >>2003-06-07. All RPMs are based on it. Shall I upgrade them >>all? This can be done within >>hours if you require it. >> >> > >I thought we had agreed to stick to 2003-06-07 unless a specific reason >for upgrading cropped up? > >I don't want us to be chasing new wxWindows bugs this close to release >unless there's a damn good reason. I'm nervous enough using CVS code... > > > We still have an open wxWindows bug with Unicode, and maybe Adam has another from QB. Maybe this issue is a reason to upgrade. Regards, Andreas
> We still have an open wxWindows bug with Unicode, and maybe Adam has > another from QB. > Maybe this issue is a reason to upgrade. > I'm pretty sure that the bugs with QB are our own. Whichever way we choose to go, please let me know so I can settle on a wxWindows tree and get it over with. :-) ahp
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 23:25, Dave Page wrote: > I thought we had agreed to stick to 2003-06-07 unless a specific reason > for upgrading cropped up? I agree we all need to stick to the same wxGTK version. From now on, I will be rebuilding wxGTK everyday from CVS. The packages wron't be publised. When needed, we should be able to upgrade all RPM packages. Cheers, Jean-Michel
Jean-Michel POURE wrote: >On Wednesday 25 June 2003 23:25, Dave Page wrote: > > >>I thought we had agreed to stick to 2003-06-07 unless a specific reason >>for upgrading cropped up? >> >> > >I agree we all need to stick to the same wxGTK version. > >From now on, I will be rebuilding wxGTK everyday from CVS. The packages wron't >be publised. > No don't do this! I tested yesterday, and had to go back to 18th to get a workable system with gtk2. The current head is marked as "broken except windows", there's heavy reconstruction work underway. Regards, Andreas
On Thursday 26 June 2003 00:43, Andreas Pflug wrote: > Maybe this issue is a reason to upgrade. Why no strore in CVS a small document with wxWindows library requirements, so that anyone can use the same. I see no objection in upgrading regularly the RPM packages, the only point is that we need to be informed... Cheers, Jean-Michel