Re: INNER JOINS in sql-select.html

At 5:56 PM -0500 10/30/03, Tom Lane wrote:
>Stefan Weiss  writes:
>>  From :
>  > | A CROSS JOIN or INNER JOIN is a simple Cartesian product, the same
>>  | as you get from listing the two items at the top level of FROM. CROSS
>>  | JOIN is equivalent to INNER JOIN ON (TRUE), that is, no rows are
>>  | removed by qualification.
>
>>  I thought that by using the second form, you would be able to do
>>  'explicit' joins, effectivly telling the planner in which order to
>>  join multiple tables (in case you have to join 10+ tables)?
>
>They are semantically equivalent, but not necessarily the same from a
>performance point of view.  The potential performance issues are covered
>elsewhere; I think it would just obfuscate matters to try to include
>that topic here.

You can imply the issue without obfuscating things.  How about:

>A CROSS JOIN or INNER JOIN is a simple Cartesian product, the same 
>as you get from listing the two items at the top level of FROM. 
>CROSS JOIN yields the same results as INNER JOIN ON (TRUE), that is, 
>no rows are removed by qualification.

-- 
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry.B.Hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu