Patch LWlocks instrumentation
От
Pierre Frédéric Caillaud
Тема
Patch LWlocks instrumentation
Дата
Msg-id
op.uz8sfkxycke6l8@soyouz
Ответ на
Re: XLogInsert (Jeff Janes)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
XLogInsert Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: XLogInsert Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: XLogInsert Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: XLogInsert Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>
Re: XLogInsert Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: XLogInsert Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>
Re: XLogInsert Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: XLogInsert Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>
Re: XLogInsert Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: XLogInsert Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
Re: XLogInsert Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: XLogInsert Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Patch LWlocks instrumentation Pierre Frédéric Caillaud<lists@peufeu.com>
Re: Patch LWlocks instrumentation Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: Patch LWlocks instrumentation Pierre Frédéric Caillaud<lists@peufeu.com>
A little bit of a reply to Jeff's email about WALInsertLock.
This patch instruments LWLocks, it is controlled with the following
#define's in lwlock.c :
LWLOCK_STATS
LWLOCK_TIMING_STATS
It is an upgrade of current lwlocks stats.
When active, at backend exit, it will display stats as shown below (here,
we have a parallel COPY with 4 concurrent processes into the same table,
on a 4 core machine).
If the (rather wide) sample output is mangled in your mail client, I've
attached it as a separate text file.
-------- Lock stats for PID 22403
PID Lock ShAcq ShWait ShWaitT ShHeldT
ExAcq ExWait ExWaitT ExHeldT Name
22403 7 0 0 0.00 0.00
2500002 730338 24.02 ( 53.49 %) 7.25 ( 16.14 %) WALInsert
22403 8 0 0 0.00 0.00
19501 73 3.48 ( 7.75 %) 0.40 ( 0.88 %) WALWrite
-------- Lock stats for PID 22404
PID Lock ShAcq ShWait ShWaitT ShHeldT
ExAcq ExWait ExWaitT ExHeldT Name
22404 7 0 0 0.00 0.00
2500002 724683 23.34 ( 51.59 %) 8.24 ( 18.20 %) WALInsert
22404 8 0 0 0.00 0.00
19418 90 4.37 ( 9.67 %) 0.44 ( 0.97 %) WALWrite
-------- Lock stats for PID 22402
PID Lock ShAcq ShWait ShWaitT ShHeldT
ExAcq ExWait ExWaitT ExHeldT Name
22402 7 0 0 0.00 0.00
2500002 735958 24.06 ( 52.73 %) 8.05 ( 17.63 %) WALInsert
22402 8 0 0 0.00 0.00
19154 97 4.21 ( 9.22 %) 0.39 ( 0.85 %) WALWrite
-------- Lock stats for PID 22400
PID Lock ShAcq ShWait ShWaitT ShHeldT
ExAcq ExWait ExWaitT ExHeldT Name
22400 7 0 0 0.00 0.00
2500002 736265 25.50 ( 55.59 %) 6.74 ( 14.70 %) WALInsert
22400 8 0 0 0.00 0.00
19391 66 2.95 ( 6.42 %) 0.39 ( 0.85 %) WALWrite
Here we see that PID 22400 spent :
25.50 s waiting to get exclusive on WALInsert
6.74 s while holding exclusive on WALInsert
The percentages represent the fraction of time relative to the backend
process' lifetime.
Here, I've exited the processes right after committing the transactions,
but if you use psql and want accurate %, you'll need to exit quickly after
the query to benchmark.
Here, for example, backends spend more than 50% of their time waiting on
WALInsert...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата: