Re: BUG #19548: Missing dependency between a graph edge and the related PK

On 16.07.26 14:13, Ayoub Kazar wrote:
> I checked with Oracle as well to see the behavior and i can confirm its 
> the same (its a standard thing, see below).
> 
> The KEY, either explicit or implicit through the PK is used just at 
> graph definition time: the catalog just keeps the column numbers in the 
> relative graph element table (in your case, the family table). There's 
> no dependency kept.

Correct.  The current behavior is intentional.