Re: jacana vs -Wimplicit-fallthrough

On 6/13/20 12:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I happened to notice today that, while the rest of the buildfarm is free
> of implicit-fallthrough warnings, jacana is emitting a whole boatload of
> them.  It looks like it must have a different idea of which spellings of
> the "fall through" comment are allowed.  Could you check its documentation
> to see what it claims to allow?
>
> 			


There doesn't seem to be any docco with it. What's odd is that fairywren
is supposedly using the identical compiler, but it's on msys2 while
jacana is msys1. I can't see why that should make a difference, though.


cheers


andrew


-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services