Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels
От
Scott Marlowe
Тема
Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels
Дата
Msg-id
dcc563d10711261500v1df7be8em5688e651aecf564f@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Damon Hart <dhcom@sundial.com>
Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock
kernels Damon Hart <dhcom@sundial.com>
Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels "Alexander Staubo" <alex@purefiction.net>
Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels "Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels "Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock
kernels Damon Hart <dhcom@sundial.com>
Re: PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock
kernels Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
On Nov 26, 2007 4:50 PM, Damon Hart wrote: > > So, what's different between these tests? I'm seeing performance > differences of between +65% to +90% transactions per second of the > OpenVZ kernel running on the HN over the stock Fedora 8 kernel. Is > this reflective of different emphasis between RHEL and Fedora kernel > builds? Some OpenVZ optimization on top of the RHEL5 build? Something > else? Where should I look? > > any insights much appreciated, How many TPS are you seeing on each one? If you are running 10krpm drives and seeing more than 166.66 transactions per second, then your drives are likely lying to you and not actually fsyncing, and it could be that fsync() on IDE / SATA has been implemented in later kernels and it isn't lying. Hard to say for sure. What does vmstat 1 have to say on each system when it's under load?
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Alexander Staubo
Дата:
От: Tom Lane
Дата: