Re: Fix misuse use of pg_b64_encode function (contrib/postgres_fdw/connection.c)
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: Fix misuse use of pg_b64_encode function (contrib/postgres_fdw/connection.c)
Дата
Msg-id
c081a0ba-6f53-4c48-8860-211804a58879@eisentraut.org
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Fix misuse use of pg_b64_encode function (contrib/postgres_fdw/connection.c) Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Re: Fix misuse use of pg_b64_encode function (contrib/postgres_fdw/connection.c) Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
On 16.01.25 02:12, Ranier Vilela wrote: > Per Coverity. > > CID 1590024: (CHECKED_RETURN) > Calling "pg_b64_encode" without checking return value (as is done > elsewhere 8 out of 10 times). > > The function *pg_b64_encode* has in the comments: > [0] "and -1 in the event of an error" > > So, the function can fail. > All other calls check the return, In this case it could not be different. > > Fix by checking the return and reporting a message to the user, > in case of failure. Thanks, fixed. (I changed the ereports to elogs, which is how other call sites do it.) I also fixed a related problem in the pg_b64_decode() calls in libpq. Maybe we could put a pg_nodiscard attribute on pg_b64_encode() and pg_b64_decode()? > [0] I think the most correct would be *or* not *and* word? I think both are ok here.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: jian he
Дата: