Re: Request to share information regarding deadlock in postgresql-9.3.6
От
John R Pierce
Тема
Re: Request to share information regarding deadlock in
postgresql-9.3.6
Дата
Msg-id
b4f16d8e-74d6-5935-1615-94d2029bca8e@hogranch.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Request to share information regarding deadlock in
postgresql-9.3.6 Yogesh Sharma <Yogesh1.Sharma@nectechnologies.in>
Re: Request to share information regarding deadlock in
postgresql-9.3.6 John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>
Re: Request to share information regarding deadlock in
postgresql-9.3.6 Yogesh Sharma <Yogesh1.Sharma@nectechnologies.in>
Re: Request to share information regarding deadlock in postgresql-9.3.6 "Charles Clavadetscher" <clavadetscher@swisspug.org>
Re: Request to share information regarding deadlock in postgresql-9.3.6 "Charles Clavadetscher" <clavadetscher@swisspug.org>
On 11/16/2016 6:22 PM, Yogesh Sharma wrote: > process 5764 is waiting for relation (table) with OID 16459(table2_primary_key), that table is blocked by process 4970 and process 4970 is waiting for a lock on another table, OID 16502(table1), which the first process has a lock on. > Process 5764: INSERT INTO table2 ( id , roll_number, name) VALUES( '1', '4','abc' ) > Process 4970: REINDEX TABLE table1, table2 etc.. > > How to resolve this problem? don't do reindex when the tables are in use. or why does process 5764 have a lock on table 1 while its inserting into table 2? or do each reindex as a seperate transaction so only one table gets locked at a time. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления