Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender
От
Andrew Dunstan
Тема
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender
Дата
Msg-id
b191b1cb-3f0e-8beb-5dfb-90291b8eaf5b@dunslane.net
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
On 5/7/21 11:27 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > On 5/7/21 12:38 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 2021-05-07 00:30:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Andres Freund writes: >>>> On 2021-05-06 21:43:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>>>> That I'm not sure about. gdb is certainly installed, and thorntail is >>>>> visibly running the current buildfarm client and is configured with the >>>>> correct core_file_glob, and I can report that the crash did leave a 'core' >>>>> file in the data directory (so it's not a case of systemd commandeering >>>>> the core dump). Seems like core-file collection should've worked >>>>> ... unless maybe it's not covering TAP tests at all? >>>> I suspect that is it - there's not really a good way for the buildfarm >>>> client to even know where there could be data directories :(. >>> Does it need to? I'm envisioning "find tmp_check -name '$core_file_glob'" >>> or something along that line. >> Yea, it'd be doable that way. It'd be a bit harder to associate the core >> files with specific tests though. But I now checked, and it indeed >> checks for core files in a specific subset of tests, and that that test >> only globs inside the passed-in datadir. >> > working on it ... > > > cheers > > see cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Andres Freund
Дата: