Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info
Дата
Msg-id
aEfgs1rHM8XX5HeS@paquier.xyz
Ответ на
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info (Fabrízio de Royes Mello)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info Xiaoran Wang <fanfuxiaoran@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info Steven Niu <niushiji@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info Xiaoran Wang <fanfuxiaoran@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info Xiaoran Wang <fanfuxiaoran@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info Steven Niu <niushiji@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info Steven Niu <niushiji@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info Xiaoran Wang <fanfuxiaoran@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info Steven Niu <niushiji@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Refactor: Extract XLogRecord info Steven Niu <niushiji@gmail.com> 
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 10:54:43PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> The refactoring LGTM but do we really need two patches? IMHO you can just
> merge everything into a single patch.

FWIW, I'm not sure what's the benefit of the proposal which comes down
to the removal of a bitwise NOT, except more code conflicts with back
branches.
--
Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Следующее
От: wenhui qiu
Дата:
FAQ