Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today?
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today?
Дата
Msg-id
ZXEwnkIweSGDH3Or@paquier.xyz
Ответ на
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? (Euler Taveira)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:32:19PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote: > IIUC trace_recovery_messages was a debugging aid in the 9.0 era when the HS was > introduced. I'm also wondering if anyone used it in the past years. FWIW, I'd be +1 for getting rid of entirely, with its conditional block in PerformWalRecovery(), as it does not bring any additional value now that it is possible to achieve much more with pg_waldump (pg_xlogdump before that) introduced a couple of years later in 9.3. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
