RE: Follow-up review items for update_deleted

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
Тема
RE: Follow-up review items for update_deleted
Дата
в 10:52:59
Msg-id
TY4PR01MB17718E2E63887B0362EC2E97D94B22@TY4PR01MB17718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: BUG #19549: Physical replication slot xmin value stuck Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
On Monday, September 7, 2026 2:37 PM Amit Kapila  wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 3:27 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 
> wrote:
> I have made minor changes in the comments to make them clear. See
> attached.
> 
> > >
> > > Both 4 and 5 are documented but will it be better to provide this
> > > information explicitly, say via Logging when the conflcit_slot is
> > > not getting advanced due to any of these reasons?
> >
> > We can do that. It seems to me we could make this improvement for PG20
> > at this stage. For PG19, I think we can improve the documentation to
> > make it a bit clearer instead. Amit and I discussed this off-list, and
> > See 0002 for the patch Amit shared to improve the doc.
> 
> Thanks for sharing the doc updates. Can you please fold those in 0001 and
> share a combined patch?

Thanks for the changes. I've merged them, here is the updated patch.

I confirmed that the patch applies cleanly on PG19 as well.

Best Regards,
Zhijie Hou
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Nikita Malakhov
Дата:
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
FAQ