Re: Inconsistencies in our SGML output

Tom Lane writes:

> Does anyone know why the very same cross-reference,
> 	 
> renders as "Part VI" here:
> 	http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql.html
> and on the next page as "Part VI in PostgreSQL 7.4beta1 Documentation":
> 	http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-syntax.html
> Given that we're building just one book now, the latter form seems
> overly verbose to me.

Apparently, there is a bug in the stylesheets.  I'm looking at it.

> Another oddity can be seen in the table of contents for the plpgsql
> chapter,
> 	http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql.html
> Why is there no TOC entry for subsection 40.2.1?  It seems to be made
> with  just the same as the other subsections.

The stylesheets deliberately don't make a TOC for a particular level if
it would consist of just one entry.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net