Re: minor doc / usage fixes
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: minor doc / usage fixes
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.44.0301282041400.789-100000@localhost.localdomain
Ответ на
Re: minor doc / usage fixes (Neil Conway)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
minor doc / usage fixes Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: minor doc / usage fixes Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: minor doc / usage fixes Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: minor doc / usage fixes Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: minor doc / usage fixes Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: minor doc / usage fixes Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Neil Conway writes:
> If you'd like to argue that including a period is incorrect, that's fair
> enough -- but please make that kind of policy consistent: other
> sentences of the same form in that document include a period ("Include
> large objects in dump.", "Dump data for table only.", etc.)
I'm not particularly attached to either format. I just vaguely recall
that I made a conscious effort to keep this distinction when I wrote the
text in question, and now I was wondering why someone else made a
conscious effort to do it differently.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления
От: Andrew Bosma
Дата: