Re: minor doc / usage fixes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: minor doc / usage fixes
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0301282041400.789-100000@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: minor doc / usage fixes  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Список pgsql-patches
Neil Conway writes:

> If you'd like to argue that including a period is incorrect, that's fair
> enough -- but please make that kind of policy consistent: other
> sentences of the same form in that document include a period ("Include
> large objects in dump.", "Dump data for table only.", etc.)

I'm not particularly attached to either format.  I just vaguely recall
that I made a conscious effort to keep this distinction when I wrote the
text in question, and now I was wondering why someone else made a
conscious effort to do it differently.

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: fix regression in .pgpass handling
Следующее
От: Andrew Bosma
Дата:
Сообщение: plpython: fix for improperly handled NULL arguments in prepared plans