Tom Lane writes:
> We can't just wait around indefinitely for port reports that may or may
> not ever appear. In any case, most of the "<7.3" entries in the list
> seem to be various flavors of *BSD; I think it's unlikely we broke
> those ...
Note that we have *zero* reports for any flavor of NetBSD and OpenBSD.
That is highly suspicious, and I would not venture a guess about how
likely it is they're broken.
(Maybe you could get someone from Red Hat to confirm the remaining Linux
ports?)
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net