Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.44.0209161907590.1307-100000@localhost.localdomain
Ответ на
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane writes: > "Jim Buttafuoco" writes: > > This seems like a "must" have option for pg_dump, > > If I was to create a patch would it make it into 7.3? > > I dunno ... I'd like to have it too, but it would break our "no new > features during beta" rule. Comments anyone? I do not believe Jim's premise that it would only take a couple of changes to a couple of queries. Clearly, it would take at least some change to any query that reads information about schema-aware objects. And it needs to be made backward compatible. And what about cross-schema dependencies? -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления