Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.44.0209161907590.1307-100000@localhost.localdomain
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane writes:

> "Jim Buttafuoco"  writes:
> > This seems like a "must" have option for pg_dump,
> > If I was to create a patch would it make it into 7.3?
>
> I dunno ... I'd like to have it too, but it would break our "no new
> features during beta" rule.  Comments anyone?

I do not believe Jim's premise that it would only take a couple of changes
to a couple of queries.  Clearly, it would take at least some change to
any query that reads information about schema-aware objects.  And it needs
to be made backward compatible.  And what about cross-schema dependencies?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: directional marks
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
FAQ