Re: wrong information about unlimied size of text field?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wrong information about unlimied size of text field? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0209032032310.1157-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | wrong information about unlimied size of text field? (Hubert depesz Lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.pl>) |
Ответы |
Re: wrong information about unlimied size of text field?
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Hubert depesz Lubaczewski writes: > according to what i know, where is a limit for up to 2gigabytes of data > in text fields (according to c.h). > this limit is of course very big, but i belive it should be mentioned in > datatype.sgml instead of saying: If you continue reading you will find The storage requirement for data of these types is 4 bytes plus the actual string, and in case of <type>character</type> plus the padding. Long strings will be compressed by the system automatically, so the physical requirement on disk may be less. In any case, the longest possible character string that can be stored is about 1 GB. (The maximum value that will be allowed for <replaceable>n</> in the data type declaration is less than that. It wouldn't be very useful to change this because with multibyte character encodings the number of characters and bytes can be quite different anyway. If you desire to store long strings with no specific upper limit, use <type>text</type> or <type>character varying</type> without a length specifier, rather than making up an arbitrary length limit.) which seems to be the information you are looking for. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: