Re: SSL (patch 1)

Tom Lane writes:

> I'm a little uncomfortable with that whole approach to things, and was
> intending to suggest that you submit the SSL changes as one big patch.
> I feel that this is not letting me see the big picture ... quite aside
> >from the probability of breakage if patches get applied out-of-order.

I had suggested to Bear Giles in private mail that he resend his original
big patch as little pieces that preferrably change only one thing at a
time.  At least for me this makes it easier to see what is going on.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net