Re: bug in join?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Laurette Cisneros
Тема
Re: bug in join?
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.33.0201021612490.18608-100000@visor.corp.nextbus.com
Ответ на
Re: bug in join? (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
bug in join? Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com>
Re: bug in join? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: bug in join? Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com>
Re: bug in join? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: bug in join? Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com>
Re: bug in join? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: bug in join? Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com>
Re: bug in join? Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com>
Thanks Tom!

On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Okay, I've been able to reproduce the problem here.  Looks like the
> eqjoinsel math is not wrong, exactly, but small roundoff errors are
> causing the logic to do unreasonable things.  I think
> get_att_numdistinct needs to round its result to an integer, and
> probably there needs to be some clamping of computed probabilities to
> the 0..1 range (otherfreq1 is coming out about -4.4703483581542969e-08
> in this example, which should be clamped to 0).
>
> Will have a fix late tonight or tomorrow.
>
> Thanks for the example case!
>
> 			regards, tom lane
>

-- 
Laurette Cisneros
(510) 420-3137
NextBus Information Systems, Inc.
www.nextbus.com
Passenger Information Everywhere


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bug in join?
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
FAQ