Re: Optimization via explicit JOINs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
David Olbersen
Тема
Re: Optimization via explicit JOINs
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.31.0103091445480.5872-100000@bubbles.electricutopia.net
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Optimization via explicit JOINs David Olbersen <dave@slickness.org>
Re: Optimization via explicit JOINs Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: Optimization via explicit JOINs David Olbersen <dave@slickness.org>
Re: Optimization via explicit JOINs Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: Optimization via explicit JOINs David Olbersen <dave@slickness.org>
Re: Optimization via explicit JOINs Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: Optimization via explicit JOINs David Olbersen <dave@slickness.org>
Re: Optimization via explicit JOINs Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: Optimization via explicit JOINs Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: Optimization via explicit JOINs Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Stephan Szabo wrote:

->Not entirely.  Those are only estimates, so they don't entirely line up
->with reality.  Also, I notice the first estimates 14 rows and the second
->1,  which is probably why the estimate is higher.  In practice it probably
->won't be significantly different.

So really I'm just getting back estimations of cost and rows returned?
Incidentally, both queries returned the same data set, that's a Good Thing (tm).

-- Dave


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления
От: Stephan Szabo
Дата:
От: Stephan Szabo
Дата:
FAQ