Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> > Maybe we should not touch getdatabaseencoding() right now, given that the
> > names we currently use are apparently almost correct anyway and
> > considering the pain it creates to alter them, and instead implement the
> > information schema views in the future?
>
> I thought schema stuffs would be introduced in 7.2 but apparently it
> would not happen...
True, but right now we'd have to do rather elaborate changes just to
switch a couple of names to "more correct" versions. Accepting them as
input is good, but maybe we should hold back on the output part a bit
until we can do it correctly.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter