Re: pg_depend
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_depend |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0107170022020.680-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_depend (Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_depend
Re: pg_depend Re: pg_depend Re: pg_depend |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alex Pilosov writes: > > I'm not so convinced on that idea. Assume you're dropping object foo. > > You look at pg_depend and see that objects 145928, 264792, and 1893723 > > depend on it. Great, what do you do now? > I believe someone else previously suggested this: > > drop <type> object [RESTRICT | CASCADE] > > to make use of dependency info. That was me. The point, however, was, given object id 145928, how the heck to you know what table this comes from? -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: