Re: FE/BE protocol oddity
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: FE/BE protocol oddity
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.30.0107062102570.679-100000@peter.localdomain
Ответ на
Re: FE/BE protocol oddity (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
FE/BE protocol oddity Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: FE/BE protocol oddity Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: FE/BE protocol oddity Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: FE/BE protocol oddity Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: FE/BE protocol oddity Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Tom Lane writes: > I think you can use the conn->status field; you shouldn't need a new > flag, just test whether status is CONNECTION_OK or not. You're right. I was confused by the comment /* Non-blocking mode only below here */ in the definition of ConnStatusType, thinking that the non-blocking mode was using some of the intermediate states. I'll change it momentarily. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления