Re: vacuum analyze again...

Bruce Momjian writes:

> No, we have no ability to randomly pick rows to use for estimating
> statistics.  Should we have this ability?

How's reading a sufficiently large fraction of random rows going to be
significantly faster than reading all rows?  If you're just going to read
the first n rows then that isn't really random, is it?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/