Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0011140032140.970-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support
Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes: > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > > > I am tempted to apply this. This is the second person who asked for > > > binding to a single port. The patch looks quite complete, with doc > > > changes. It appears to be a thorough job. > > > > Postmaster options are evil, please put something in backend/utils/guc.c. > > (This is not the fault of the patch submitter, since this interface is new > > for 7.1, but that still doesn't mean we should subvert it.) > > I have put code in guc.c to handle this, but there still are postmaster > options for it too. What happened to the concerns that were raised? The socket file is a lock file, you cannot just move it around. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: