Re: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0010170007560.862-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
| Ответы |
Re: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump
Re: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump Re: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner writes:
> >I like the pg_{import,export} names myself ... *nod*
>
> Sounds fine also; but we have compatibility issues in that we still need
> pg_dump. Maybe just a symbolic link to pg_export.
I'm not so fond of changing a long-established program name for the sake
of ethymological correctness or consistency with other products (yeah,
right). I got plenty of suggestions if you want to start that. I say
stick to pg_dump[all], and name the inverse pg_undump, pg_load, or
pmud_gp.
Btw., it will still be possible to restore, er, reload, with psql, right?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: