Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2)
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.21.0009281033380.363-100000@peter
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Pete Forman <gsez020@kryten.bedford.waii.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Jason Tishler writes:

> I ran the regression tests on the Cygwin PostgreSQL build.  All tests
> except for two passed.  So following the instructions found near the
> beginning of regress.out, I am reporting "any apparent problems" found
> to the list.
> 
> The two tests that failed are horology and random.  See attached for diffs
> between the expected and results.  My guess is that the horology failures
> can be safely ignored.  Unfortunately, I'm not quite so sure for random.

The horology result is a known failure on platforms that don't properly
support daylight savings time before 1970.  Add the following line to the
file resultmap (at the end, for example):

	horology/*-*-cygwin*=horology-no-DST-before-1970

then that test should pass.  I will do the same thing in the development
branch.

The random test can indeed be safely ignored, the point being that this
test may fail randomly.


-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/

В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления
От: Jason Tishler
Дата:
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
FAQ