Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2)
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take
2)
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.21.0009281033380.363-100000@peter
Ответ на
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) (Jason Tishler)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Pete Forman <gsez020@kryten.bedford.waii.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take
2) Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take
2) Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take
2) Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take
2) Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take
2) Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2) Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
Jason Tishler writes: > I ran the regression tests on the Cygwin PostgreSQL build. All tests > except for two passed. So following the instructions found near the > beginning of regress.out, I am reporting "any apparent problems" found > to the list. > > The two tests that failed are horology and random. See attached for diffs > between the expected and results. My guess is that the horology failures > can be safely ignored. Unfortunately, I'm not quite so sure for random. The horology result is a known failure on platforms that don't properly support daylight savings time before 1970. Add the following line to the file resultmap (at the end, for example): horology/*-*-cygwin*=horology-no-DST-before-1970 then that test should pass. I will do the same thing in the development branch. The random test can indeed be safely ignored, the point being that this test may fail randomly. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления
От: Jason Tishler
Дата:
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата: