Re: Makefile.global is kind of a pain
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Makefile.global is kind of a pain |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0006221844100.4086-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Makefile.global is kind of a pain (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Makefile.global is kind of a pain
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes: > Awhile back I was complaining that configure was dumping its results > into too many files already. If you're saying that configure should ideally only substitute things into Makefile.global and nowhere else then we're never going to have separate build directories, unless you know something that I don't. Every subdirectory where you build anything at all needs to have a Makefile.in. (Hint: How else will the build tree be created? How will the build tree find the source tree?) Yes, that will eventually make config.status run four times longer than it does now but that's the price to pay. If we don't want to do that then it'd be best that I know now. (Now that I spelled this out, I'm not sure myself whether that's worth it. Maybe we should forget about it and get rid of all *.in. It would certainly make my job easier.) -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: