Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0005291754030.359-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system (Andreas Zeugswetter <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andreas Zeugswetter writes: > Imho this is an area where it does make sense to look at what other > db's do, because it makes the toolwriters life so much easier if pg > behaves like some other common db. The defined interface to the privilege system is GRANT, REVOKE, and "access denied" (and a couple of INFORMATION_SCHEMA views, eventually). I don't see how other db's play into this. > Other db's usually use a char array for priaction and don't have > priisgrantable, but code it into priaction. Or they use a bitfield. > This has the advantage of only producing one row per table. That's the price I'm willing to pay for abstraction, extensibility, and verifyability. But I'm open for better ideas. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: