Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system
Дата
в 13:06:40
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.21.0005291754030.359-100000@localhost.localdomain
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Andreas Zeugswetter writes:

> Imho this is an area where it does make sense to look at what other
> db's do, because it makes the toolwriters life so much easier if pg
> behaves like some other common db.

The defined interface to the privilege system is GRANT, REVOKE, and
"access denied" (and a couple of INFORMATION_SCHEMA views, eventually).
I don't see how other db's play into this.

> Other db's usually use a char array for priaction and don't have
> priisgrantable, but code it into priaction. Or they use a bitfield.
> This has the advantage of only producing one row per table.

That's the price I'm willing to pay for abstraction, extensibility, and
verifyability. But I'm open for better ideas.


-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
FAQ