Re: Typo about subxip in comments
От
Japin Li
Тема
Re: Typo about subxip in comments
Дата
Msg-id
MEYP282MB166994010FABEFF20823BF76B6029@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Ответ на
Re: Typo about subxip in comments (Amit Kapila)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Typo about subxip in comments Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
Re: Typo about subxip in comments Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: Typo about subxip in comments Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: Typo about subxip in comments Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Re: Typo about subxip in comments Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: Typo about subxip in comments Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
Re: Typo about subxip in comments Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: Typo about subxip in comments Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
Re: Typo about subxip in comments Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 at 12:12, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 2:45 PM Japin Li wrote: >> Maybe a wrong plural in XidInMvccSnapshot(). >> >> * Make a quick range check to eliminate most XIDs without looking at the >> * xip arrays. >> >> I think we should use "xip array" instead of "xip arrays". >> > > I think here the comment is referring to both xip and subxip array, so > it looks okay to me. > Yeah, it means xip in normal case, and subxip in recovery case. >> Furthermore, if the snapshot is taken during recovery, the xip array is >> empty, and we should check subxip array. How about changing "xip arrays" >> to "xip or subxip array"? >> > > I don't know if that is an improvement. I think we should stick to > your initial proposed change. Agreed. Let's focus on the initial proposed change. -- Regrads, Japin Li. ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата: