Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL
От
Imseih (AWS), Sami
Тема
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL
Дата
Msg-id
CBDD913D-E05C-45A3-B9D8-4EC3A3B10EE1@amazon.com
Ответ на
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL (Robert Haas)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>
Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
> I agree. Testing StandbyMode here seems bogus. I thought initially > that the test should perhaps be for InArchiveRecovery rather than > ArchiveRecoveryRequested, but I see that the code which switches to a > new timeline cares about ArchiveRecoveryRequested, so I think that is > the correct thing to test here as well. > Concretely, I propose the following patch. This patch looks similar to the change suggested in https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/FB0DEA0B-E14E-43A0-811F-C1AE93D00FF3%40amazon.com to deal with panics after promoting a standby. The difference is the patch tests !ArchiveRecoveryRequested instead of !StandbyModeRequested as proposed in the mentioned thread. Thanks -- Sami Imseih Amazon Web Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления