Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread
От
Jacob Champion
Тема
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread
Дата
Msg-id
CAOYmi+kJ7rYm4DWg9CQi13Ewv_9EK0RjrKDB8a_w=cNG+mLp7Q@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread (Daniel Gustafsson)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread "Tristan Partin" <tristan@partin.io>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 2:06 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > The entire OpenSSL 3.x line will be down to just 3.5 LTS by the time we ship > v20. Yeah. Though RH have been apparently shipping breaking updates to OpenSSL in RHEL 9+, so the conversation may look completely different when we get to those EOLs. > One complicating factor when it comes to OpenSSL is that we need the 1.1.1 API > support in order to keep LibreSSL supported. True -- but I think that even if your split didn't land, surrounding the necessary code with `#ifdef LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER` would be a big maintainability upgrade compared to "all code paths must support both OpenSSL 1.1.1 _and_ LibreSSL which is kind-of-not-really-the-same". --Jacob
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата: