Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Jacob Champion
Тема
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread
Дата
в 00:32:23
Msg-id
CAOYmi+kJ7rYm4DWg9CQi13Ewv_9EK0RjrKDB8a_w=cNG+mLp7Q@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread "Tristan Partin" <tristan@partin.io>
Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 2:06 PM Daniel Gustafsson  wrote:
> The entire OpenSSL 3.x line will be down to just 3.5 LTS by the time we ship
> v20.

Yeah. Though RH have been apparently shipping breaking updates to
OpenSSL in RHEL 9+, so the conversation may look completely different
when we get to those EOLs.

> One complicating factor when it comes to OpenSSL is that we need the 1.1.1 API
> support in order to keep LibreSSL supported.

True -- but I think that even if your split didn't land, surrounding
the necessary code with `#ifdef LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER` would be a
big maintainability upgrade compared to "all code paths must support
both OpenSSL 1.1.1 _and_ LibreSSL which is
kind-of-not-really-the-same".

--Jacob


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
FAQ