Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats.
От
vignesh C
Тема
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats.
Дата
Msg-id
CALDaNm0kxRKJTJKu5BvZTaBOpuQwp2csj2wqXeWn4BZmLPMDWg@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats. vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 3:36 AM Peter Smith wrote: > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 1:02 AM vignesh C wrote: > > > > Thanks for the comments, Attached v3 patch has the changes as suggested. > > This v3 mostly looks good to me now except for some minor comments > about the flags. > > ~~~ > > 1. Commit flags > > @@ -6534,11 +6536,11 @@ Commit > > > > - Int8 > + Uint8(0) > > > > - Flags; currently unused (must be 0). > + Flags (uint8(0)); currently unused (must be 0). > > > > > a) There is no data type Uint8. That should be "Int8(0)" > Modified. > b) I think the "(0)" does not belong in the description part. > e.g. change to "Flags (uint8); currently unused (must be 0)." > Modified > ~~~ > > 2. Stream Commit flags > > @@ -7276,7 +7284,7 @@ Stream Commit > > > > - Flags; currently unused (must be 0). > + Flags (uint8(0)); currently unused (must be 0). > > > > > a) The data type should say "Int8(0)" > Modified. > b) I think the "(0)" does not belong in the description part. > e.g. change to "Flags (uint8); currently unused (must be 0)." > Modified. > ~~~ > > 3. I felt that saying "(must be 0)" for those unused flag descriptions > is unnecessary since that is exactly what "Int8(0)" already means. > e.g. consider change to just say "Flags (uint8); currently unused." Modified. Thanks for the comments. Attached v4 patch has the fix for the same. Regards, Vignesh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Bharath Rupireddy
Дата: