Re: validate synatax
От
Szymon Guz
Тема
Re: validate synatax
Дата
Msg-id
CAFjNrYtw_2L-iN87KybB33i87D8_jYPsbKj=UvS8cWX=Qn4HpQ@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: validate synatax (Peter Kroon)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
validate synatax Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>
Re: validate synatax Jerry Sievers <gsievers19@comcast.net>
Re: validate synatax Jov <zhao6014@gmail.com>
Re: validate synatax Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>
Re: validate synatax Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>
Re: validate synatax Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>
Re: validate synatax Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>
Re: validate synatax Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>
Re: validate synatax Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
On 11 December 2013 15:35, Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps creating a temporary table would be more efficient.Then the rollback isn't necessary.
Yep, but only if you're sure that you don't have queries which change other parts of the database, including calling procedures which could change data or structure. That's why I like the fact that even DDLs are transactional in Postgres :)
Szymon
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
