Re: validate synatax

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Szymon Guz
Тема Re: validate synatax
Дата
Msg-id CAFjNrYtw_2L-iN87KybB33i87D8_jYPsbKj=UvS8cWX=Qn4HpQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: validate synatax  (Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general



On 11 December 2013 15:35, Peter Kroon <plakroon@gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps creating a temporary table would be more efficient.
Then the rollback isn't necessary.   



Yep, but only if you're sure that you don't have queries which change other parts of the database, including calling procedures which could change data or structure. That's why I like the fact that even DDLs are transactional in Postgres :)

Szymon

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Kroon
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: validate synatax
Следующее
От: Dev Kumkar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [ADMIN] Scheduled Events