Re: obsolete code
От
Pavel Stehule
Тема
Re: obsolete code
Дата
Msg-id
CAFj8pRC9MguCS4sTm6DYz66L3z00M3txEEfmLbLSNQyTSQfKhA@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: obsolete code (Andrew Dunstan)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
obsolete code Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: obsolete code Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: obsolete code Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: obsolete code Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: obsolete code Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: obsolete code Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: obsolete code Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: obsolete code Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: obsolete code Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: obsolete code Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
2013/2/1 Andrew Dunstan : > > On 02/01/2013 10:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> Andrew Dunstan writes: >>> >>> fmgr.c contains this: >>> * DEPRECATED, DO NOT USE IN NEW CODE >>> Should we just drop all support for the old interface now? >> >> Is there any actual benefit to removing it? I don't recall that >> it's been the source of any maintenance burden. I'd be fine with >> dropping it if it were costing us something measurable, but ... >> >> > > > > My hope was that if we got rid of the old stuff we wouldn't need to use > > PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(myfunc); > removing function descriptor should not be good idea - it can be used for some annotation. I had a similar issue - and can be nice, if it is solved with some assertions. Regards Pavel > > > in external modules any more (I recently got bitten through forgetting this > and it cost me an hour or two). > > cheers > > andrew > > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления