Re: [BUGS] BUG #14721: Assertion of synchronous replication

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Thomas Munro
 wrote:
>         /*
>          * Acquiring the lock is not needed, the latch ensures proper
>          * barriers. If it looks like we're done, we must really be done,
>          * because once walsender changes the state to SYNC_REP_WAIT_COMPLETE,
>          * it will never update it again, so we can't be seeing a stale value
>          * in that case.
>          */

Yeah, counting on the latch for free barriers doesn't work if you
happen to see SYNC_REP_WAIT_COMPLETE first time through the loop, or
if you see it after a spurious signal woke you and then it's
immediately set to SYNC_REP_WAIT_COMPLETE.  In those cases, the
following Assert statement is making an assertion about cache
coherency that doesn't work even on a friendly TSO system.

Can you reproduce the problem with this experimental patch applied?

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs