Re: psycopg3: a first report
От
Daniele Varrazzo
Тема
Re: psycopg3: a first report
Дата
Msg-id
CA+mi_8a57tS19oxdN5LtToVd8mXZMwqNG1F8Q3qv+zvckx6N9g@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: psycopg3: a first report (Stefan Knecht)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
psycopg3: a first report Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>
Re: psycopg3: a first report Stefan Knecht <knecht.stefan@gmail.com>
Re: psycopg3: a first report Rory Campbell-Lange <rory@campbell-lange.net>
Re: psycopg3: a first report Stefan Knecht <knecht.stefan@gmail.com>
Re: psycopg3: a first report Rory Campbell-Lange <rory@campbell-lange.net>
Re: psycopg3: a first report Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>
Re: psycopg3: a first report Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>
Re: psycopg3: a first report Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>
Having the client provide general handling for in-flight timeouts would be the overall best solution imho.
I agree on this: the client should be aware of timeouts, both on connection and querying.
If we keep the waiting loops in Python and only use non-blocking C functions I think making sure every operation has a timeout is achievable.
-- Daniele
В списке psycopg по дате отправления
