Re: pgbench post-connection command

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: pgbench post-connection command
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nM+pg2eGyBwxaFm4bn1KTDSn566-e8fWkOEPb9OBZ0_Diw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgbench post-connection command  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: pgbench post-connection command  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> This seems rather poorly designed, mainly because there's no reason to
>>> think that a single command would be sufficient.
>
>> It supports multiple commands via multi-statement requests
>> e.g.
>> -x "SET this = on; SET that = off"
>
> I don't believe that works for multiple \set commands, which is the
> more likely use-case for this; as noted upthread, executing SET here
> is quite unnecessary since you can get that behavior with
> "export PGOPTIONS".

OK, so you want...

\setonce <command>

or?

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remembering bug #6123
Следующее
От: Scott Mead
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: IDLE in transaction introspection